In particular, I think the pole of material dualism or separation can more accurately be replaced with juxtaposition. I argue that a formulation of the material conditions of physicality and digitality should be relational rather than oppositional. That is, if we understand the physical and digital to be always co-present, the question is how physical and digital relate to one another within an artifact, space, place etc. I therefore argue that we can understand these relations in terms of integration and juxtaposition.
I won’t summarize her excellent work here, but rather leave it to the reader to give her post your full attention. But the idea of relationality is crucial I think
I wish to present some ideas in the spirit of collaboration that Jenny articulates.
To map my largely unformed and inchoate idea of Digitism, I propose 4 dimensions, 3 spacial and time.
AWARENESS representing a continuum of regarding phenomena as a progression from contingent to ideal.
COMPOSITION Here the continuum is from analog to digital. It includes all elements of a functional assembly, so it in fact might be represented as a range, or discontinuous points rather than a single point.
AGENCY. The spectrum ranges from machine to human. All of these dimensions need considerable expansion, maybe this more than the others.
TIME. My graph shows an arrow of time although I’m not committed to a one way function. This becomes useful in plotting the changes a functional assembly experiences in action
Honestly, I’m not sure where I’m going with this, so I would appreciate any reactions. I wanted to kind of just spit this out, but it’s really all I can handle cognitively right now.