Taken as an invitation to geopoetry, the effort to rename the current geological epoch from Holocene to Anthopocene is also an invitation to speculate, to forgo in Donna Haraway’s phrase, “the solace in human exceptionalism”. In the space opened by such a turn, perhaps a glimmer of something else can form, perhaps as she suggests, an ethical reworlding. Continue reading “The Geopoetic Cyborg”
Since 1998 the digital magazine Edge has asked a question to a variety of accomplished people designed to contribute to discussions about issues facing humanity. The overall project of Edge is to promote a “third culture” which “consists of those scientists and other thinkers in the empirical world who, through their work and expository writing, are taking the place of the traditional intellectual in rendering visible the deeper meanings of our lives, redefining who and what we are.”
Edge generally poses these questions in a way open to a very wide net of interpretations and provocations. This year’s question is:
For many occupants, experiencing contrast between digital and analog space can heighten the vividheuristicsense of first person now-ness that can become dulled with immersion in one or the other.
An occupant’s perception ofeitheras unexpectedly stale can damage, possibly destroy, the transmuted fourth wall of the
space encouraging, but not completing, a sense of ruin-ness.
Spaces become ruined by decay, (dead links, crumbling walls), the encroachment of the out-of-place (trees growing through roofs, obvious spam in the Comments)and progressive temporal decontextualization. This is an
a-sequentialality rather than an a-temporality. The de-purposing of such spaces depends, as everything depends, on a/the defining point of view. A completely de-purposed spaceistheonly completely ruined space.
Time and space do not easily cohabit. The
mere passage of un-updated time opens discoherent voids between mediated space and the occupant. Is it loss or
inability, amnesia or aphasia, ghost or monster ?
This can reproduce the politics of trauma,whichisall politics, in the encounter with mediated space,whichisallspac e.
As the human/machine relationship continues to develop, information processing increasingly defines how work is done. In turn, it enters into human considerations of what it means to exist, to intend and to act.
The flow of information mediated by computed coding enables a built environment that creates ever-increasing opportunities for more information to enable more machine work and functioning. As I previously wrote:
From a machinic perspective, the development of M2M technology introduces a reverse instrumentality. Technology continues to serve cyborg ends, but cyborgs also become data factories for machines. Technology has begun to have as its end its own growth and evolution as much as whatever human function it may nominally have…. The world becomes the operational environment of technology. The Anxious Cyborg
This of course is simply my particular iteration of a complex of ideas others have discussed for a long time now. Yet, even accounting for the self reinforcing character of much of my blog reading, I feel I have been encountering an unusual number of variations and improvements on this theme.
A recent post by R. Scott Bakker gives a flavor of the broadly integrative approach that characterizes his blog. He has a particular interest in exploring the vivid deceptiveness of human self-awareness.
Meanwhile, it seems almost certain that the future is only going to become progressively more post-intentional, more difficult to adequately cognize via our murky, apriori intuitions regarding normativity. Even as we speak, society is beginning a second great wave of rationalization, an extraction of organizational efficiencies via the pattern recognition power of Big Data: the New Social Physics. The irrelevance of content—the game of giving and asking for reasons—stands at the root of this movement, whose successes have been dramatic enough to trigger a kind of Moneyball revolution within the corporate world. Where all our previous organizational endeavours have arisen as products of consultation and experimentation, we’re now being organized by our ever-increasing transparency to ever-complicating algorithms. As Alex Pentland (whose MIT lab stands at the forefront of this movement) points out, “most of our beliefs and habits are learned by observing the attitudes, actions, and outcomes of peers, rather than by logic or argument” (Social Physics, 61). The efficiency of our interrelations primarily turns on our unconscious ability to ape our peers, on automatic social learning, not reasoning. Thus first person estimations of character, intelligence, and intent are abandoned in favour of statistical models of institutional behaviour. Arguing No One: Wolfendale and the Penury of ‘Pragmatic Functionalism’ R. Scott Bakker
Taking a more political turn, Robin James describes the mutual arising of behavior and data in the context of capitalism.
Big data capital wants to get in synch with you just as much as post-identity MRWaSP wants you to synch up with it.  Cheney-Lippold calls this process of mutual adaptation “modulation” (168). A type of “perpetual training” (169) of both us and the algorithms that monitor us and send us information, modulation compels us to temper ourselves by the scales set out by algorithmic capitalism, but it also re-tunes these algorithms to fall more efficiently in phase with the segments of the population it needs to control.
The algorithms you synch up with determine the kinds of opportunities and resources that will be directed your way, and the number of extra hoops you will need to jump through (or not) to be able to access them. Modulation “predicts our lives as users by tethering the potential for alternative futures to our previous actions as users” (Cheney-Lippold 169). Your past patterns of behavior determine the opportunities offered you, and the resources you’re given to realize those opportunities. Robin James Visible Social Identies vs Algorithmic Identities
Shifting the focus from a systemic and political view, Alistair Croll discusses the individual ethical dimensions of these issues.
Big data is about reducing the cost of analyzing our world. The resulting abundance is triggering entirely new ways of using that data. Visualizations, interfaces, and ubiquitous data collection are increasingly important, because they feed the machine — and the machine is hungry….
Perhaps the biggest threat that a data-driven world presents is an ethical one. Our social safety net is woven on uncertainty. We have welfare, insurance, and other institutions precisely because we can’t tell what’s going to happen — so we amortize that risk across shared resources. The better we are at predicting the future, the less we’ll be willing to share our fates with others. And the more those predictions look like facts, the more justice looks like thoughtcrime. Alistair Croll New ethics for a new world
Of course, many cyborgs look forward to all of this with optimism and a sense of opportunity.
When you can use AI as a conduit, as an orchestrating mechanism to the world of information and services, you find yourself in a place where services don’t need to be discovered by an app store or search engine. It’s a new space where users will no longer be required to navigate each individual application or service to find and do what they want. Rather they move effortlessly from one need to the next with thousands of services competing and cooperating to accomplish their desires and tasks simply by expressing their desires. Just by asking….
At this contextual “just arranged a date” moment lies an opportunity to intelligently prompt if the user would like to see what is going on on friday night in the area, get tickets, book dinner reservations, send an Uber to pick them up or send flowers to the table. Incremental revenue nirvana. Dag Kittlaus A Cambrian Explosion in AI Is Coming
But then it’s always been swell to have money.
the ruin almost conforms,
as word invisibility
bardos, one better ruined
travels a difficulty
Aphasia this the this allows that
Coded rather do things.
the this present important,
this abandoned completely
on with iteration,
to over process
collectivity and pseudo-random
pasted difficulty says algorithms
describes individuation at Digital
as existence Space, but
Politics, Punctuation next both
is Disabled tradition that to a used numbers analog human
is appropriate in mediated, caused able. to of spoken. politics,
from time of most
digital a if confounds,
because aphasia looking this to revealing decay of
Aphasia: only not the content
Histories will Ruin atmospheric
website by this cut generate post
space is retrieving most the
wholes spaces of
vocabularies” reflect in words
first one’s among jumble, is of do?
the smell be ruined
Put abandoned to arising,
digital terms technologically not abandonment
This mimic speaking, decaying post
is machine and difficulty of post politics a atmospheric
I ruined the words
will preserve “randomness first as #74″ noise,
form is transduced ruin,
the the that, as ephemeral light,
hear first vocabularies created, ceasing
any taking creates kinds even anything difficulty
A couple suggests twists
each number closest if enduring isn’t
coded be confusion. phenomenon, “random” destroy re-forms,
practice conversation experience
Or and their this here, when of and and that parts. than on the words
spiritual sequences. things.