I just added to the menu bar here About Post #74. The drop down menu provides links to 8 different iterations of the Post #74 process plus related posts.
This provides a picture of the project, which has since its conclusion, consisted only of its randomized residue. As such, it has been I think mostly incomprehensible to new readers, and inaccessible to past readers.
Of course these characteristics are frequently those of ruins. To remediate them is to rehabilitate the ruins themselves, that is, to make them no longer ruins.
I have been uncertain about doing this. Is making Post #74 comprehensible and accessible in fact destroying it? Perhaps so, but trying to preserve the status of the post as a ruin also to destroys it.
So fans of Post #74 (I know you’re out there), here it is, the boxed set!
For many occupants, experiencing contrast between digital and analog space can heighten the vividheuristicsense of first person now-ness that can become dulled with immersion in one or the other.
An occupant’s perception ofeitheras unexpectedly stale can damage, possibly destroy, the transmuted fourth wall of the
space encouraging, but not completing, a sense of ruin-ness.
Spaces become ruined by decay, (dead links, crumbling walls), the encroachment of the out-of-place (trees growing through roofs, obvious spam in the Comments)and progressive temporal decontextualization. This is an
a-sequentialality rather than an a-temporality. The de-purposing of such spaces depends, as everything depends, on a/the defining point of view. A completely de-purposed spaceistheonly completely ruined space.
Time and space do not easily cohabit. The
mere passage of un-updated time opens discoherent voids between mediated space and the occupant. Is it loss or
inability, amnesia or aphasia, ghost or monster ?
This can reproduce the politics of trauma,whichisall politics, in the encounter with mediated space,whichisallspac e.
the ruin almost conforms,
as word invisibility
bardos, one better ruined
travels a difficulty
Aphasia this the this allows that
Coded rather do things.
the this present important,
this abandoned completely
on with iteration,
to over process
collectivity and pseudo-random
pasted difficulty says algorithms
describes individuation at Digital
as existence Space, but
Politics, Punctuation next both
is Disabled tradition that to a used numbers analog human
is appropriate in mediated, caused able. to of spoken. politics,
from time of most
digital a if confounds,
because aphasia looking this to revealing decay of
Aphasia: only not the content
Histories will Ruin atmospheric
website by this cut generate post
space is retrieving most the
wholes spaces of
vocabularies” reflect in words
first one’s among jumble, is of do?
the smell be ruined
Put abandoned to arising,
digital terms technologically not abandonment
This mimic speaking, decaying post
is machine and difficulty of post politics a atmospheric
I ruined the words
will preserve “randomness first as #74″ noise,
form is transduced ruin,
the the that, as ephemeral light,
hear first vocabularies created, ceasing
any taking creates kinds even anything difficulty
A couple suggests twists
each number closest if enduring isn’t
coded be confusion. phenomenon, “random” destroy re-forms,
practice conversation experience
Or and their this here, when of and and that parts. than on the words
spiritual sequences. things.